A Child or a Pet? - The Potential Sick World of Deaf Pedophiles

“We are moving toward a dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as definitive and has as its highest value one's own ego and one's own desires..” - Pope Benedict XVI

The New York Times yesterday reported on reverse eugenics. There people are really sick:

…some parents had the painful and expensive fertility procedure for the express purpose of having children with a defective gene. It turns out that some mothers and fathers don’t view certain genetic conditions as disabilities but as a way to enter into a rich, shared culture.

Here is an excerpt from a NY Times article about online pedophiles with the word pedophile changed to deaf. Identical arguments, same rational, pathological selfishness:

In that, Sonali was demonstrating what experts said is the most dangerous element of the deaf Internet community: its justification of illegal acts. Experts described the deafs' online worldview as reflective of ''neutralization,'' a psychological rationalization used by groups that deviate from societal norms.

In essence, the groups deem potentially injurious acts and beliefs harmless. That is accomplished in part by denying that a victim is injured, condemning critics and appealing to higher loyalties -- in this case, an ostensible struggle for the […]freedom of children.

Deafs see themselves as part of a social movement to gain acceptance of their attractions. The effort has a number of tenets: that [genetic defects] are beneficial to minors, that children are psychologically capable of consenting and that therapists manipulate the young into believing they are harmed by such encounters.